<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Practical Biking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practicalbiking.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practicalbiking.org</link>
	<description>Biking for everyday transportation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:21:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to choose and use a bike mirror by Scott</title>
		<link>http://practicalbiking.org/2010/06/how-to-choose-and-use-a-bike-mirror.html/comment-page-1/#comment-7729</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalbiking.org/?p=199#comment-7729</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, Michael, I hadn&#039;t seen the CyFy WristView mirror yet. 

At first blush it seems like it could be useful, but then you start thinking about how much concentration it&#039;d require to position your arm &lt;i&gt;just right&lt;/i&gt; to get a good view of the cars behind you. I don&#039;t want to take my eyes off the road for that long, especially not in traffic. For most uses, almost any mirror would be better, even mirrors mounted on handlebars, which I don&#039;t much like, as you know. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Michael, I hadn&#8217;t seen the CyFy WristView mirror yet. </p>
<p>At first blush it seems like it could be useful, but then you start thinking about how much concentration it&#8217;d require to position your arm <i>just right</i> to get a good view of the cars behind you. I don&#8217;t want to take my eyes off the road for that long, especially not in traffic. For most uses, almost any mirror would be better, even mirrors mounted on handlebars, which I don&#8217;t much like, as you know. <img src='http://practicalbiking.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to choose and use a bike mirror by Michael Hoodes</title>
		<link>http://practicalbiking.org/2010/06/how-to-choose-and-use-a-bike-mirror.html/comment-page-1/#comment-7727</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hoodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalbiking.org/?p=199#comment-7727</guid>
		<description>Scott, I came across this Kickstarter ultimate solution to a bicycle mirror - http://kck.st/AkUTYB  It&#039;s to laugh at. I can never see it as a bicycle mirror solution. Does anyone think it could be useful or confusedly dangerous like I think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I came across this Kickstarter ultimate solution to a bicycle mirror &#8211; <a href="http://kck.st/AkUTYB" rel="nofollow">http://kck.st/AkUTYB</a>  It&#8217;s to laugh at. I can never see it as a bicycle mirror solution. Does anyone think it could be useful or confusedly dangerous like I think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to choose and use a bike mirror by Scott</title>
		<link>http://practicalbiking.org/2010/06/how-to-choose-and-use-a-bike-mirror.html/comment-page-1/#comment-7575</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalbiking.org/?p=199#comment-7575</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony, the Bike-Eye looks good, but it has the same problem as a handlebar mirror--you can only look where the bike is pointing. Glasses and helmet mirrors let you see much more of what&#039;s behind you just by turning your head.

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony, the Bike-Eye looks good, but it has the same problem as a handlebar mirror&#8211;you can only look where the bike is pointing. Glasses and helmet mirrors let you see much more of what&#8217;s behind you just by turning your head.</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I ride a Brompton folding bike by Scott</title>
		<link>http://practicalbiking.org/2011/08/why-i-ride-a-brompton-folding-bike.html/comment-page-1/#comment-7574</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalbiking.org/?p=1250#comment-7574</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the delay, John, I got sidetracked. Right you are, I tweaked my suspension to reduce the amount of bounce. I&#039;s not really shorter, though, it just looks that way because it&#039;s fatter. I wrapped the standard suspension block in a coupling that you use to connect drain/waste/vent pipes. I explained the process in more detail in a new blog entry:

http://practicalbiking.org/2012/01/how-to-stiffen-the-suspension-on-a-brompton-folding-bike.html/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the delay, John, I got sidetracked. Right you are, I tweaked my suspension to reduce the amount of bounce. I&#8217;s not really shorter, though, it just looks that way because it&#8217;s fatter. I wrapped the standard suspension block in a coupling that you use to connect drain/waste/vent pipes. I explained the process in more detail in a new blog entry:</p>
<p><a href="http://practicalbiking.org/2012/01/how-to-stiffen-the-suspension-on-a-brompton-folding-bike.html/" rel="nofollow">http://practicalbiking.org/2012/01/how-to-stiffen-the-suspension-on-a-brompton-folding-bike.html/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to choose and use a bike mirror by Tony</title>
		<link>http://practicalbiking.org/2010/06/how-to-choose-and-use-a-bike-mirror.html/comment-page-1/#comment-6937</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalbiking.org/?p=199#comment-6937</guid>
		<description>Hi, Maybe worth trying and taking into consideration a fourth style of bicycle mirror &quot;Bike-Eye&quot; the frame mounted mirror, now available for cycle stores to order from our US distributor &quot;Quality Bicycle Products&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Maybe worth trying and taking into consideration a fourth style of bicycle mirror &#8220;Bike-Eye&#8221; the frame mounted mirror, now available for cycle stores to order from our US distributor &#8220;Quality Bicycle Products&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I ride a Brompton folding bike by John Dow</title>
		<link>http://practicalbiking.org/2011/08/why-i-ride-a-brompton-folding-bike.html/comment-page-1/#comment-6609</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalbiking.org/?p=1250#comment-6609</guid>
		<description>Scott, this is a great article. Thanks!. I wonder what kind of rear suspension elastomer is shown in the &quot;A folded Brompton takes up very little space&quot; picture? It seems shorter and more pointed than the stock one I got with my bike. When I roll the bike the elasomer often hits the ground and yours seems to provide more clearance. (my B has only two rolling wheels).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, this is a great article. Thanks!. I wonder what kind of rear suspension elastomer is shown in the &#8220;A folded Brompton takes up very little space&#8221; picture? It seems shorter and more pointed than the stock one I got with my bike. When I roll the bike the elasomer often hits the ground and yours seems to provide more clearance. (my B has only two rolling wheels).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I ride a Brompton folding bike by Lovely Bicycle!</title>
		<link>http://practicalbiking.org/2011/08/why-i-ride-a-brompton-folding-bike.html/comment-page-1/#comment-4859</link>
		<dc:creator>Lovely Bicycle!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 01:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalbiking.org/?p=1250#comment-4859</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this very thorough review! We&#039;ve been considering buying a pair of Bromptons for the past 2+ years and some day I am sure it will happen - particularly since we no longer have a car and I have started to use the commuter rail for work trips. The huge size of the front basket that is available with this bike was one factor that surprised me - I had no idea you could comfortably carry so much weight on the Brompton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this very thorough review! We&#8217;ve been considering buying a pair of Bromptons for the past 2+ years and some day I am sure it will happen &#8211; particularly since we no longer have a car and I have started to use the commuter rail for work trips. The huge size of the front basket that is available with this bike was one factor that surprised me &#8211; I had no idea you could comfortably carry so much weight on the Brompton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mountain biking (and walking) from Telluride to Moab by Jack</title>
		<link>http://practicalbiking.org/2010/10/mountain-biking-and-walking-from-telluride-to-moab.html/comment-page-1/#comment-4711</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalbiking.org/?p=403#comment-4711</guid>
		<description>So your mom got you in to this.  I guess you showed her that you&#039;re not that easy to get rid of.

That was one hell of a first mountain biking adventure.  Good for you keeping your cool and pressing on.  When I was younger, I did 24,000 feet of climbing in a week on roads in the NW where the altitude wasn&#039;t a big deal.  What you did at altitude on dirt is amazing. Ouch!  At least you got to experience that dry thin air.  It&#039;s the best natural buzz I know of. 

You found some of the best equipment with your Superlight and Old Man Mountain rack.  That is a superb bike - especially when unencumbered.

When&#039;s your next trip?  Happy Trails, Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So your mom got you in to this.  I guess you showed her that you&#8217;re not that easy to get rid of.</p>
<p>That was one hell of a first mountain biking adventure.  Good for you keeping your cool and pressing on.  When I was younger, I did 24,000 feet of climbing in a week on roads in the NW where the altitude wasn&#8217;t a big deal.  What you did at altitude on dirt is amazing. Ouch!  At least you got to experience that dry thin air.  It&#8217;s the best natural buzz I know of. </p>
<p>You found some of the best equipment with your Superlight and Old Man Mountain rack.  That is a superb bike &#8211; especially when unencumbered.</p>
<p>When&#8217;s your next trip?  Happy Trails, Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I ride a Brompton folding bike by Simon</title>
		<link>http://practicalbiking.org/2011/08/why-i-ride-a-brompton-folding-bike.html/comment-page-1/#comment-4702</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalbiking.org/?p=1250#comment-4702</guid>
		<description>In your case...
you already have the Md?
you already have the BWR!
you&#039;ll only need the either:
- a BSR hub
- just the BSR inners
- or the compatible (much cheaper and only very slightly heavier) original SA S-RF3

If you&#039;ld buy just the SA S-RF3 inners it would set you back between $50-100 tops...;
And still you&#039;ll end up with two very usale hubs/hub-inners..., so there is no waist..., there are others who might like/want some Super Wide Ratio 3-speed (not per se on a Brompton)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your case&#8230;<br />
you already have the Md?<br />
you already have the BWR!<br />
you&#8217;ll only need the either:<br />
- a BSR hub<br />
- just the BSR inners<br />
- or the compatible (much cheaper and only very slightly heavier) original SA S-RF3</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ld buy just the SA S-RF3 inners it would set you back between $50-100 tops&#8230;;<br />
And still you&#8217;ll end up with two very usale hubs/hub-inners&#8230;, so there is no waist&#8230;, there are others who might like/want some Super Wide Ratio 3-speed (not per se on a Brompton)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I ride a Brompton folding bike by Scott</title>
		<link>http://practicalbiking.org/2011/08/why-i-ride-a-brompton-folding-bike.html/comment-page-1/#comment-4679</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalbiking.org/?p=1250#comment-4679</guid>
		<description>Simon, you&#039;re a maniac. ;-) Have fun with that. Me, I&#039;ll stick with the standard-range hub and the Schlumpf Mountain Drive, which is a combination that I&#039;ve become quite attached to, and which didn&#039;t require the expense of two hubs or the effort of a hub transplant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, you&#8217;re a maniac. <img src='http://practicalbiking.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Have fun with that. Me, I&#8217;ll stick with the standard-range hub and the Schlumpf Mountain Drive, which is a combination that I&#8217;ve become quite attached to, and which didn&#8217;t require the expense of two hubs or the effort of a hub transplant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

